<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nontheist Friends &#187; James Riemermann</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/author/james-riemermann/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org</link>
	<description>For Quakers and others interested in nontheism among Friends (Quakers)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:20:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Intellect and Spirituality</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/intellect-and-spirituality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/intellect-and-spirituality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Riemermann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nontheistfriends.org/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...I don’t mean that everyone should engage in or care about this kind of intellectual wrestling, and I certainly don’t mean that our worship should become intellectual debate or performance–yuck. But the widespread fear of and distaste for intellect, as if the search for understanding could possibly be a bad thing, does not serve us well...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/intellect-and-spirituality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Different Understanding of Scripture</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/a-different-understanding-of-scripture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/a-different-understanding-of-scripture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Riemermann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nontheistfriends.org/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My friend Nat Case, from my own Twin Cities Friends Meeting, has a <a href="http://maphead.blogspot.com">blog</a> I hadn't paid much attention to until a month or two ago.  I don't know how much of my inattention  is because I hadn't noticed how smartly provocative his writing is, and how much is because, as a cartographer, he's been writing less for a mapmaking audience lately, and more for Quakers and other people who question the meaning of religion. People like me.

This post expands on a brief comment I made on his post <a href="http://maphead.blogspot.com/2009/01/fragments-of-religion-that-never.html">Fragments of a Religion That Never Existed</a>, where Nat writes in part:
<blockquote>"What I'm interested in here is the idea of scripture not defined by its innate qualities (e.g. dictated by God), but by its functional qualities. What does scripture do? I find scripture-as-community-glue interesting, but my sympathies lie with scriptures-taken-to-heart. I do have a series of books, passages from books, poems, some formal religious texts, ballads, and films that form what I believe is similar to the sort of scripture-taken-to-heart that orthodox folk might have. Except I do not have a community that draws from the same set of texts."</blockquote>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/a-different-understanding-of-scripture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two cheers for Quaker history</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/two-cheers-for-quaker-history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/two-cheers-for-quaker-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Riemermann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Other Sites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nontheistfriends.org/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Friend on the nontheist Friends e-mail discussion list at some point challenged us to seriously study early Quaker history, and not just dip into it, &#8220;to develop our knowledge of and insights into the origins and development of the tradition or movement we have committed to.&#8221; Good advice, no question. And yet I felt [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/two-cheers-for-quaker-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>God Circle</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/god-circle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/god-circle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 19:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Riemermann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/god-circle/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Circle 1 = God 
2. Circle 2 = the natural world 
3. Circle 1 minus Circle 2 = the supernatural world ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/god-circle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the basis of Quaker membership?</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/what-is-the-basis-of-quaker-membership/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/what-is-the-basis-of-quaker-membership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 16:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Riemermann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/what-is-the-basis-of-quaker-membership/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Friend on the nontheist Friends email list asked what the basis for membership might be, or more specifically, what a basis might be for turning someone down for membership. The question was not specifically about belief/disbelief in God, so I did not particularly address that. I suppose, by not addressing such belief/disbelief, I am [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/what-is-the-basis-of-quaker-membership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is a Nontheist?</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/what-is-a-nontheist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/what-is-a-nontheist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Riemermann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nontheistfriends.org/what-is-a-nontheist/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both within and outside the informal association of Friends who call themselves nontheists, there is little common understanding of what the word nontheist means. There is also little common understanding of related words such as atheist, agnostic, humanist, and materialist, but believers and unbelievers alike have at least a sense of what they mean by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/what-is-a-nontheist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One God at Most, or Two Gods at Least?</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/one-god-at-most-or-two-gods-at-least/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/one-god-at-most-or-two-gods-at-least/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 17:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Riemermann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nontheistfriends.org/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I am to speak of God at all, even metaphorically, I find I must speak of two gods. This may be the reason I tend not to speak of God. Both gods speak to me as metaphors, but I have difficulty calling them by the same name.
It is not the world that my theology [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/one-god-at-most-or-two-gods-at-least/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quaker Culture vs. Quaker Faith</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/quaker-culture-vs-quaker-faith/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/quaker-culture-vs-quaker-faith/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Riemermann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nontheistfriends.org/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve gotten into an interesting exchange HERE on Chris M&#8217;s mysteriously titled blog &#8220;Tables, Chairs and Oaken Chests.&#8221; I&#8217;ll have to look closer to see how he came to that title.
Anyway, Chris&#8217;s article holds up Samuel Caldwell&#8217;s well-known 1998 address at Pendle Hill, and I take a couple of jabs at it. Below is my [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/quaker-culture-vs-quaker-faith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A liberal Quaker rant against conservative-leaning liberal Quakerism</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/a-liberal-quaker-rant-against-conservative-leaning-liberal-quakerism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/a-liberal-quaker-rant-against-conservative-leaning-liberal-quakerism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 18:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Riemermann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nontheistfriends.org/ntfblog/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been bouncing around the world of Quaker blogs, as I sometimes do, and once again, I find that world filled with Friends who are disappointed with the liberalism of liberal Quakerism, who want it to become more conservative, which is mostly to say more narrowly defined and exclusive. Of course, they don&#8217;t want it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/a-liberal-quaker-rant-against-conservative-leaning-liberal-quakerism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Spiritual Journey</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/my-spiritual-journey-riemermann/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/my-spiritual-journey-riemermann/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 00:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Riemermann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Journeys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nontheistfriends.org/my-spiritual-journey/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Presented at Twin Cities Friends Meeting (St. Paul, Minnesota, USA), spring 2000 or so
I received a list of questions to help me prepare for this morning&#8217;s talk. I understand it was just intended to help me approach the subject of my spiritual journey, and not as a set of directions.
I considered politely setting the list [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/my-spiritual-journey-riemermann/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.293 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-04 05:41:04 -->
