<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nontheist Friends &#187; Blog Posts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nontheistfriends.org/category/blog-posts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org</link>
	<description>For Quakers and others interested in nontheism among Friends (Quakers)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:30:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Identity Creation: Nontheist Quaker</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/identity-creation-nontheist-quaker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/identity-creation-nontheist-quaker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 19:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Liberty Britton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nontheistfriends.org/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The creation of an identity is often a long process, some of which is conscious and some of which happens through experience. In many ways it is similar to the French art form of bricolage, using found pieces of whatever is around to create a unique piece of artwork. Identity work is constrained by the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/identity-creation-nontheist-quaker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doctrinally Open Membership in the Religious Society of Friends</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/doctrinally-open-membership-in-the-religious-society-of-friends-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/doctrinally-open-membership-in-the-religious-society-of-friends-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 15:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Os Cresson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agnostic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quakerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology/atheology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nontheistfriends.org/?p=199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doctrinally open membership is becoming more accepted by Friends.  What is this method of arriving at membership decisions?  How does it affect other areas of Quaker life and what does this imply for the future of the Religious Society of Friends? The Method Consider a typical Friends meeting.  Members gather in silent worship.  They cooperate [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/doctrinally-open-membership-in-the-religious-society-of-friends-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roots and Flowers of Quaker Nontheism</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/roots-and-flowers-of-quaker-nontheism-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/roots-and-flowers-of-quaker-nontheism-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Os Cresson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agnostic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naturalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quakerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology/atheology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nontheistfriends.org/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PART I: ROOTS OF QUAKER NONTHEISM             This is a look at the roots of Quaker nontheism today. Nontheist Friends are powerfully drawn to Quaker practices but they do not accompany this with a faith in God.             Nontheist is an umbrella term covering atheists, agnostics, secular humanists, pantheists and wiccaists. You can combine nontheist [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/roots-and-flowers-of-quaker-nontheism-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One nontheist&#8217;s understanding of &#8220;the light&#8221; of Quakerism</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/one-nontheists-understanding-of-the-light-of-quakerism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/one-nontheists-understanding-of-the-light-of-quakerism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Riemermann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republished]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quakerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republished]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology/atheology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nontheistfriends.org/?p=176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To seek to live in the light is essentially a value, a principle of living, rather than a belief. We need no theology, nor even a particular conception of “the light” as a distinct quality, in order to seek to live by it. Perhaps it would help me to clarify my point, if I described my own quirky, incomplete, and mostly psychological sense of where “the light” comes from]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/one-nontheists-understanding-of-the-light-of-quakerism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Quaker Unity</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/on-quaker-unity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/on-quaker-unity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 01:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Os Cresson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republished]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quakerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republished]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nontheistfriends.org/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unity during meeting for worship for attention to business is familiar to Quakers. It is a commitment to move forward together and, significantly, it does not mean we have to hold the same views. This method of doing business has long been characteristic of Quakers.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/on-quaker-unity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intellect and Spirituality</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/intellect-and-spirituality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/intellect-and-spirituality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Riemermann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quakerism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nontheistfriends.org/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...I don’t mean that everyone should engage in or care about this kind of intellectual wrestling, and I certainly don’t mean that our worship should become intellectual debate or performance–yuck. But the widespread fear of and distaste for intellect, as if the search for understanding could possibly be a bad thing, does not serve us well...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/intellect-and-spirituality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waking up Dead</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/waking-up-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/waking-up-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Schogol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stories and poems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nontheistfriends.org/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t recall the first time I woke up dead, having done so many times since. Each time feels like the first time, so maybe it&#8217;s an ongoing thing &#8212; waking up dead. There are days when I wake up fully alive, and those are the cruelest of all. Those are the days when I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/waking-up-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Different Understanding of Scripture</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/a-different-understanding-of-scripture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/a-different-understanding-of-scripture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Riemermann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quakerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology/atheology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nontheistfriends.org/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My friend Nat Case, from my own Twin Cities Friends Meeting, has a <a href="http://maphead.blogspot.com">blog</a> I hadn't paid much attention to until a month or two ago.  I don't know how much of my inattention  is because I hadn't noticed how smartly provocative his writing is, and how much is because, as a cartographer, he's been writing less for a mapmaking audience lately, and more for Quakers and other people who question the meaning of religion. People like me.

This post expands on a brief comment I made on his post <a href="http://maphead.blogspot.com/2009/01/fragments-of-religion-that-never.html">Fragments of a Religion That Never Existed</a>, where Nat writes in part:
<blockquote>"What I'm interested in here is the idea of scripture not defined by its innate qualities (e.g. dictated by God), but by its functional qualities. What does scripture do? I find scripture-as-community-glue interesting, but my sympathies lie with scriptures-taken-to-heart. I do have a series of books, passages from books, poems, some formal religious texts, ballads, and films that form what I believe is similar to the sort of scripture-taken-to-heart that orthodox folk might have. Except I do not have a community that draws from the same set of texts."</blockquote>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/a-different-understanding-of-scripture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nontheism among Friends at Powell House – report</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/nontheism-among-friends-at-powell-house-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/nontheism-among-friends-at-powell-house-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Alexander</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republished]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naturalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quakerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republished]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nontheistfriends.org/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["If you think Richard Dawkins is too easy on religion, go down to that end of the room," I said, indicating the steps up to the bookstore. "And if you..."

"Careful..." someone said.

And I was. There were several believers-in-God present – the exact number depending on your definition – and I didn't want to make a joke that might be taken the wrong way.

"If you're, uh... very theistic, go down to the other end," I finished, indicating the fireplace. "And if you're somewhere in between, go somewhere in between."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/nontheism-among-friends-at-powell-house-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two cheers for Quaker history</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/two-cheers-for-quaker-history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/two-cheers-for-quaker-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Riemermann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quakerism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nontheistfriends.org/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Friend on the nontheist Friends e-mail discussion list at some point challenged us to seriously study early Quaker history, and not just dip into it, &#8220;to develop our knowledge of and insights into the origins and development of the tradition or movement we have committed to.&#8221; Good advice, no question. And yet I felt [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/two-cheers-for-quaker-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>God Circle</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/god-circle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/god-circle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 19:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Riemermann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/god-circle/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Circle 1 = God 
2. Circle 2 = the natural world 
3. Circle 1 minus Circle 2 = the supernatural world ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/god-circle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the basis of Quaker membership?</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/what-is-the-basis-of-quaker-membership/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/what-is-the-basis-of-quaker-membership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 16:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Riemermann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quakerism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/what-is-the-basis-of-quaker-membership/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Friend on the nontheist Friends email list asked what the basis for membership might be, or more specifically, what a basis might be for turning someone down for membership. The question was not specifically about belief/disbelief in God, so I did not particularly address that. I suppose, by not addressing such belief/disbelief, I am [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/what-is-the-basis-of-quaker-membership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The NTF dove</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/the-ntf-dove/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/the-ntf-dove/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 14:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Os Cresson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quakerism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/the-ntf-dove/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be nice to know who else uses our dove logo. Happily, it appears on a page about a peace fair at Buckingham Friends School (http://home.comcast.net/~buckinghamfriends/peacefair.htm). The dove was found in the public domain in 2004 by Crystal Hashmet when she created the first NTF website at www.quaker.org. Let&#8217;s see where else this little [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/the-ntf-dove/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is a Nontheist?</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/what-is-a-nontheist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/what-is-a-nontheist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Riemermann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agnostic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quakerism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nontheistfriends.org/what-is-a-nontheist/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both within and outside the informal association of Friends who call themselves nontheists, there is little common understanding of what the word nontheist means. There is also little common understanding of related words such as atheist, agnostic, humanist, and materialist, but believers and unbelievers alike have at least a sense of what they mean by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/what-is-a-nontheist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One God at Most, or Two Gods at Least?</title>
		<link>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/one-god-at-most-or-two-gods-at-least/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/one-god-at-most-or-two-gods-at-least/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 17:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Riemermann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quakerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology/atheology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nontheistfriends.org/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I am to speak of God at all, even metaphorically, I find I must speak of two gods. This may be the reason I tend not to speak of God. Both gods speak to me as metaphors, but I have difficulty calling them by the same name. It is not the world that my [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nontheistfriends.org/article/one-god-at-most-or-two-gods-at-least/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

